To deny citizens with the right to bear arms would be a form of taking away rights to citizens, rights that are what America is built on. Nevertheless, guns are one of the leading causes of death. As individuals fight for their rights to bear arms they fail to realize that some individuals use that right for harm even though other individuals may be responsible gun owners. Firearms Laws, Rules, and Regulations Firearms are available to anyone over the age of 18 without a record in most states.
Constitution grants every citizen the right to carry a gun, which is somewhat restricted by federal and state firearm-related laws to prevent abuse. For example, there are background checks for prospective buyers and regulations that prohibit gun possession to certain groups of citizens, such as criminals, drug addicts, and people with mental illnesses.
However, major loopholes in the current legislation, complemented with increased gun violence and massive shootings across the country are seen as a reasonable cause to introduce stricter gun control Beckett et al.
In this essay, I intend to present arguments of both gun control proponents and opponents and provide suggestions as to how this issue might be addressed. Both sides of the debate present many convincing facts that prove the necessity or unacceptability of strict gun control laws.
To begin with, anti-gun forces maintain that the Second Amendment is outdated and fails to reflect the present-day reality Cohen, Furthermore, gun control proponents claim that the Founders could not know how deadly firearms would become in future and what threat they could cause to the innocent citizens.
Opponents disagree and argue that even at the times when the Constitution was written, firearms were deadly enough for the drafters to realize potential consequences of their decision Leef, Gun control debate is essentially about one group of citizens wanting to enjoy their rights and another group of citizens who are afraid that these rights will cause harm.
Gun control opponents claim that only people can be blamed for crimes, not guns. They note that it is unfair to restrict their rights only because someone may take advantage of the Second Amendment to kill or harm people.
Although this point looks quite reasonable, one should not forget that restrictions have been introduced not to limit law-abiding citizens but to prevent potentially dangerous ones from possessing firearms. Therefore, there is nothing wrong with undergoing background checks or following some rules concerning gun carrying and possession as long as they ensure public safety.
It is still not clear whether gun control regulations help prevent mass shootings and homicide. For now, statistics shows that the United States has one of the highest homicide rates among the developed countries, which can serve as a convincing point against gun use.
Besides, contrary to the argument provided by gun control opponents, civilians possessing a gun do not help stop mass shooters or prevent crimes Okamoto, Obviously, given the fact that these findings are rather outdated, they cannot be used as a convincing proof of the gun possession importance.
Therefore, more nationwide, credible studies need to be conducted before making any changes in state and federal gun control laws. To summarize, I would like to note that gun control debate is a complex issue that will undoubtedly attract public attention in years to come.
With the increase of gun violence and massive shootings, people feel vulnerable, so it is natural for them to demand stricter gun control laws. It is important, however, to remember that gun possession is a part of the American history, which is of particular importance for some citizens.
Therefore, there is a strong need to find a compromise and make sure that both sides of the argument feel their rights and safety are protected. Accidental deaths, suicides, and crime. Guns kill people in the US because we pervert the Second Amendment.In general, most pro-gun law activists, want guns to be regulated more strictly–no guns for mentally ill people, ban on assault rifles, requirements to education classes on gun safety, make weapons safer, ban on high capacity magazines, and tougher background checks.
Gun control is the kind of topic that inspires emotion, so it is hard to stick to logic and restrain from emotion. Yet, the format of a gun control argumentative essay demands just that. This is the most noteworthy feature by which you differ a gun control argumentative essay from a persuasive one.
Do Stricter Gun Control Laws Really make us Safer? Essay - Gun control is a very touchy topic in the US. mass shootings have made this subject harder to talk about, but Americas strong belief in the 2nd amendment make it impossible to completely take away our guns.
Why Gun Control Is Bad Essay. Gun Control Argumentative Essay All guns have the potential to be dangerous and should be handled with care. Guns have been part of American life for as long as people can remember.
For most people guns are perceived as very dangerous and harmful.
Watch video · Some gun control supporters believe that completely banning handguns is the best way to protect citizens. However, banning handguns fails to protect people because the laws are ineffective, banning handguns prevents people from an effective means of self-defense, and the laws do not solve the real problem, which is the gun .
Argumentative Gun Control Essay Words | 6 Pages Argumentative Gun Control Paper The issue of Gun Control has been on the minds of humans for hundreds of years.