Sudoku is one of the most popular puzzle games of all time.
Select network Stem cell research and cloning are controversial. Scientists claim medical necessity. This sample expository essay explores the argument against stem cell research. Arguments against stem cell research and cloning Stem cell research refers to scientific research on elements within the human body known as stem cells for the purposes of achieving medical breakthroughs.
This is a quite controversial issue in these times, with different groups of people holding radically different ideas about how the issue must be handled.
This essay will focus on four main points: The relationship between stem cell research and abortion The problem of what could be called "playing God" The specific issue of stem cell research in connection with the broader issue of a culture of life Identify some of the main implications of this argument Stem cell research and abortion The issue of stem cell research has always been closely connected with the issue of abortion.
This is because, as Robertson has indicated, human embryos consist of one of the most potent sources of stem cells, and the extraction of stem cells from the embryos requires the destruction of the embryos. This destruction, then, is what both abortion and embryonic stem cell research have in common.
According to the argument against stem cell research, the embryo is a fully living human being; therefore, the destruction of embryos for the purposes of scientific research would be completely unacceptable.
Moreover, this would especially be the case in the event that embryos were manufactured specifically for the purposes of stem cell research—that is, with the explicit intention of destroying them. Unethical to research an unwilling death Insofar as it is accepted that the embryo is a human life, the implications necessarily follow: The problem with stem cell research, then, would be that insofar as it relies on embryonic stem cells, it either implicitly or explicitly provides an incentive for murder.
The objection could perhaps be raised that the harm done to an embryo by stem cell research would be outweighed by the potential good to humanity that would result in terms of the alleviation of suffering.
However, there are two main reasons why this objection could be identified as invalid. The first pertains to what has been called the moral doctrine of double effect, which stipulates that it is never acceptable to utilize a morally unacceptable action as a means toward achieving a moral end, no matter how good that end may be.
Moral implications of stem cell experimentation on an embryo Pro-life supporters argue the destruction of the embryo would be morally unacceptable, and it would thus not be acceptable to use it as a means toward the alleviation of suffering.
Secondly, it must be remembered that within the context of the argument under consideration, the embryo is in fact conceptualized as an actual human being. Insofar as this is the case, then the same objections could be raised against destroying embryos in order to alleviate the suffering that could be raised against murdering one group of people in order to alleviate the suffering of another group of people.
It is unclear whether the embryo is an actual human being. However, it can at least be acknowledged that insofar as some starting point for life must be identified, conception does not seem to be an especially bad one.
Determining if embryo is life or not This is for the conceptual reason that the distinction between life and non-life must be a qualitative one; and whereas every distinction between fetal stages after conception is merely quantitative or a difference of degree and not of kindthe moment of conception itself could be understood as a qualitative jump.
Moreover, as Percy has observed, "it is commonplace in biology. The idea that the embryo is a living human being is thus at the very least fully defensible on rational grounds; and at any rate, it cannot be categorically dismissed on purely rational grounds.
Stem cell research, cloning, and playing God Another element of the argument against stem cell research pertains to the problem of playing God. Essentially, the concern here is that with stem cell research, scientists are beginning to delve into a morally dangerous area insofar as they are exploring knowledge that has to do with the very origins of life itself.In both cases the embryos are created with a purpose – in case of IVF yunusemremert.comNIC STEM CELL RESEARCH IS ETHICAL In addition to the use of aborted fetuses and spare embryos from IVF clinics for stem 9 cell research.” (Hurlbut.
“The benefits of 5/5(1).
Nov 18, · Cbest essay lengtheners cover page for high school research paper writing your dissertation in fifteen minutes a eku admissions essay personal statement essay act3 good interest catchers for essays on education, essay about the theme of love in romeo and juliet taisteal essays debdeep jena phd dissertation proposal national education policy.
For these reasons they regard Embryonic Stem Cell Research as a modern day “Pandora’s box” and believe that it is better kept “shut”. The “moral status” of an embryo is the centre of the Embryonic Stem Cell Research ethical 5/5(1).
Many timely persuasive speech topics can be found on radio, TV, your local newspaper, or your Facebook and Twitter feeds.
We also have Argumentative (which is a persuasive topic as well, just on a controversial issue) and Policy yunusemremert.com you know of a cool topic, please send it to us and we will publish it on a page with fresh topics. For persuasive essay topic ideas have a look at our list. Stem cell research and its funding have caused enormous controversy over the past decade.
Stem cells are pluripotent cells present in all living organisms. These cells can differentiate into any type of cell, including blood cells, nerves, cardiac muscle, and pancreatic islet cells.
Find A+ essays, research papers, book notes, course notes and writing tips. Millions of students use StudyMode to jumpstart their assignments.